Educational Resource Hub

Critical and Creative Thinking through Cultural and Indigenous Perspectives

CLASS SCRIPT

Class Script: Critical and Creative Thinking through Cultural and Indigenous Perspectives

Total Class Length: 90 Minutes
Teaching Style: Workshop

(0-7 Minutes) Segment 1: Hook – The Power of Good Decisions

Teacher: Good morning, everyone. So glad to have you here. Let’s start with a moment of reflection. Think about a time you had to make a really important decision – maybe for your family, your work, or your community. It could be something big like choosing a career path, or something critical for your community like organizing a local event.

(Spice Rack: Personal Reflection / Think-Pair-Share Prompt)
Teacher: What process did you use to make that decision? What kind of information did you consider? Who did you talk to or consult with? Take just 30 seconds to jot down a few thoughts or just hold them in your mind.

(Pause for 30 seconds.)

Teacher: Now, turn to a person next to you and briefly share one thought about your decision-making process. What was a key step or influence?

(Allow 2 minutes for quick pair-sharing.)

Teacher: Thank you for sharing. We all make decisions every day, big and small, and often without realizing how much critical and creative thinking we’re already doing. Today, we're going to explore how we can sharpen those natural skills – what we call critical and creative thinking – by looking at powerful approaches that combine traditional logical methods with the profound wisdom found in Indigenous knowledge systems and sustainability models. It’s about expanding your mind to see problems and solutions through a wider, more interconnected lens, especially for the well-being of our communities and future generations.

(7-32 Minutes) Segment 2: Plain-Language Explainer – Bridging Worlds of Wisdom

Teacher: Welcome back. To truly understand how we can blend these powerful ways of thinking, let's first get on the same page about what critical and creative thinking entails, and then connect it to essential Indigenous perspectives.

(What is Critical and Creative Thinking? - 5 minutes)
Teacher: Think of critical thinking as your internal detective. It's about carefully and skillfully examining information, arguments, and ideas. It involves asking 'why,' looking for evidence, understanding different perspectives, and recognizing hidden assumptions. Creative thinking, on the other hand, is about generating new ideas, solutions, and approaches – often thinking outside the box to innovate. When we combine them, we're not just finding flaws; we're also building new, better, and more thoughtful ways forward.

(Why Indigenous Perspectives are Crucial - 5 minutes)
Teacher: For millennia, Indigenous peoples have developed sophisticated systems for thinking critically and creatively, especially around sustainability, community well-being, and decision-making for future generations. These approaches are often based on relationality – the deep understanding that all things are connected: people, land, spirits, and ancestors. This isn't just a nice idea; it's a practical worldview that embeds principles of responsibility, respect, and reciprocity. It shows us that true " giving back" isn't just charity, but a fundamental cultural practice and responsibility, serving as a form of nation-building and resistance to colonial erasure and ensuring Indigenous continuance.

(Key Concepts for Our Journey - 15 minutes)
Teacher: Let's unpack some important terms that will help us combine these ways of thinking:

  • Indigenization: This isn't just adding a few Indigenous stories to a lesson. It's a deep transformation of educational institutions, curricula, and pedagogies to weave Indigenous worldviews, knowledge systems, languages, and experiences into the very fabric of learning. It challenges traditional Western Academic Structures to become more inclusive and relevant.
  • Decolonizing Methodologies: These are research and teaching approaches that critically examine, challenge, and dismantle the colonial biases and power structures embedded in traditional Western academic practices. They aim to center Indigenous voices, knowledge, and perspectives, pushing back against settler colonialism.
  • Epistemologies: This fancy word just means 'theories of knowledge,' or 'how we know what we know.' Different cultures have different epistemologies. Indigenous epistemologies often value lived experience, observation, spirituality, and oral traditions, recognizing Knowledge Keepers as vital sources, alongside empirical data.
  • Relational Pedagogy: This teaching approach prioritizes building meaningful, respectful, and reciprocal relationships between students, instructors, and communities as central to the learning process. It fosters transformative intent in education.
  • Land-Based Learning: An educational approach that connects students directly to the natural environment and local ecosystems, often integrating Indigenous knowledge, cultural practices, and a sense of place into learning experiences.
  • Decentering the Instructor’s Authority: This means shifting away from a traditional classroom model where the instructor is the sole source of knowledge and authority, towards a more collaborative and shared knowledge creation process involving students and community members.
  • Medicine Wheel: A broadly used Indigenous symbol and teaching tool, often represented as a circle divided into four quadrants (e.g., mental, physical, emotional, spiritual well-being). Its specific meaning varies, but it serves as a powerful conceptual bridge for holistic thinking and self-reflection.
    • (Misconception Check): It's important to remember that while the Medicine Wheel is a sacred symbol for many, in a learning context, we can also approach it as a flexible, pragmatic teaching tool and metaphor for holistic balance, rather than a reified, rigid spiritual dogma. It can be understood through a secular approach focusing on its practical wisdom.
  • The Menominee Theoretical Model of Sustainability (MTMS): This is a brilliant example of place-based Indigenous sustainability. Rooted in Menominee culture and their specific forest management, it’s a six-dimensional framework that emphasizes continuance, intergenerational planning, and resilience. It's a practical, real-world model of Indigenous planning that integrates culture, economy, environment, and governance, as championed by the Sustainable Development Institute (SDI).

(32-47 Minutes) Segment 3: Worked Example – Solving Community Challenges Holistically

Teacher: Now, let's see how this looks in practice. We'll use a scenario that many communities face.

(Spice Rack: Case Study / Instructor Think-Aloud)
(Case Study: Addressing Water Quality in a Local River - 15 minutes)

  • Scenario: A local river, vital for fishing, cultural practices, and community recreation, is showing signs of pollution from nearby industrial activity and agricultural runoff. The community needs to develop a plan to address this complex problem.

Traditional Critical Thinking Approach (Instructor Think-Aloud):
Teacher:"First, using traditional critical thinking, I'd gather all the available data: water quality reports, maps of pollution sources, relevant government regulations. I'd identify potential hypotheses for the pollution (e.g., industrial waste, agricultural chemicals). I'd look at the validity of arguments from different stakeholders – industry, farmers, residents – to understand their perspectives and evidence. I'd assess the probability of success for different clean-up methods based on scientific research. My problem-solving steps would involve clearly defining the problem, brainstorming solutions, evaluating them based on cost and effectiveness, and then implementing the best option."
(Quick Interaction)
Teacher:"What do you think might be missing from this purely scientific, logical approach when we're talking about a community's river?" (Allow a few quick verbal responses or a show of hands if something comes to mind, e.g., 'the people's connection,' 'the future.')

Integrating Indigenous Perspectives (Instructor Think-Aloud):
Teacher:"Now, let's bring in Indigenous perspectives to make this thinking more comprehensive, ethical, and sustainable.

  • Relationality: Instead of just seeing the river as a 'resource,' how do we understand our relationship to it? It's a living entity, an ancestor, a provider. This immediately expands our responsibility. We would ask: 'What is our reciprocal relationship with the river?' This means not just taking, but actively giving back to and caring for it as kin.
  • Place-Based Knowledge: We'd consult Knowledge Keepers and elders who have generations of intimate knowledge about that specific river – its history, its cycles, its plants, its animals. They understand its spirit and patterns far beyond current scientific data alone.
  • Intergenerational Planning (Menominee Model inspiration): We wouldn't just plan for next year's clean-up. We'd ask: 'How will this decision impact the seventh generation from now? What is our responsibility for Indigenous Futurity?' This shifts us from short-term fixes to long-term continuance and sovereignty restoration.
  • Decentering Authority: We wouldn't just rely on government scientists or industry experts. We'd involve community members, youth, tribal environmental programs, local fishermen, and cultural practitioners in every step of the planning, valuing their diverse epistemologies equally. This is true nation-building through shared governance and care.
  • Holistic Well-being (Medicine Wheel inspiration): We'd consider the pollution's impact not just on physical health, but also on the community's emotional, spiritual, and mental well-being, and its cultural practices. How does a polluted river affect ceremonies or traditional food gathering?
  • Outcome: By combining rigorous scientific analysis with deep relational understanding, intergenerational responsibility, and community-centered decision-making, our plan becomes far more robust, ethical, and truly sustainable.
(Misconception Check): "Notice how Indigenous knowledge doesn't replace scientific data but enriches and expands it. It provides a more holistic, ethical, and deeply connected way to solve problems, moving beyond just 'facts' to include relationships, values, and long-term well-being. It's not one or the other; it's both, integrated."

(47-77 Minutes) Segment 4: Peer Activity – Applying Integrated Thinking

Teacher: Excellent work. Now it's your turn to put these ideas into action. You'll work in small groups for about 20 minutes to tackle a new challenge, then we'll share back our insights.

(Spice Rack: Group Case Study / Collaborative Discussion)
(Group Activity: Community Food Sovereignty Challenge - 25 minutes for group work + 5 minutes for share-out)

  • Scenario: Your community is concerned about food security and wants to establish a local, sustainable food system – perhaps a community garden or a network of traditional food producers. However, there are challenges: lack of accessible land, limited funding, differing opinions on how to start, and potential loss of traditional knowledge about planting/harvesting.

Instructions for Groups:

  1. Form small groups (3-4 people).
  2. Discuss for 20 minutes: How would you approach this challenge using both traditional critical thinking and Indigenous perspectives?
    • Traditional Critical Thinking questions:
      • What specific problems need to be solved (e.g., land access, funding, knowledge gap)?
      • What data or information do you need to gather (e.g., soil tests, budget figures, land ownership records)?
      • What are possible solutions (brainstorm as many as you can)?
      • What are the pros and cons of each solution from a logical/practical standpoint?
    • Indigenous Perspective questions (integrate at least three of these):
      • How does relationality(to the land, to community members, to ancestors) guide your approach? What does it mean to " give back" to the land and each other in this context?
      • How would you incorporate Knowledge Keepers and intergenerational wisdom into your planning and decision-making?
      • How does this project contribute to Indigenous continuance, survivance, and nation-building?
      • How can you use a holistic lens (like the Medicine Wheel) to ensure the project supports mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being of the community?
      • What elements of place-based Indigenous sustainability(like the Menominee model) might apply to creating a food system rooted in your specific environment?
      • How would you ensure decentering instructor authority and empowering community voices throughout the project's life cycle?
  3. Appoint a spokesperson to share your group's key ideas.

(After 20 minutes of group work)

Teacher: Alright everyone, let's bring it back together. Thank you for those deep discussions. Each group, please share one or two key insights or solutions that emerged from blending these different ways of thinking. What felt different or more powerful when you combined them?

(Allow 5 minutes for brief group shares, facilitating a quick exchange of ideas.)

(77-84 Minutes) Segment 5: Quick Check – Testing Our Understanding

Teacher: Thank you for those rich discussions! Let's do a quick check to see what's resonating. No need to call out answers, just reflect for a moment on these questions.

(Spice Rack: Anonymous Reflection / Thumbs Up/Down)
(Quick Check Questions - 5 minutes)

  1. Thumbs Up/Down/Sideways: Does Indigenization mean simply adding Indigenous content as an 'extra' to a Western curriculum, or does it mean transforming the core curriculum to incorporate Indigenous worldviews as fundamental? (Show of hands: Thumbs up for transformation, down for 'add-on', sideways if unsure).
    • (Misconception Check): "The goal of Indigenization is truly transformative – it's about weaving Indigenous knowledge into the very fabric of how we think and learn, making it fundamental, not a superficial add-on. It's dynamic and evolving, not reified or static."
  2. Which of these is not a core principle of Decolonizing Methodologies?
    • A) Emphasizing relationality
    • B) Respecting Indigenous epistemologies
    • C) Centralizing instructor authority
    • D) Challenging colonial biases
    • (Pause for reflection. Answer: C) "Decolonizing methodologies aim to decenter instructor authority, not centralize it, fostering shared knowledge and empowering community voices and Knowledge Keepers."
  3. In your own words, how does thinking about ' giving back ' from an Indigenous perspective differ from a typical charity model?(Allow a few seconds for silent reflection, or ask for one or two volunteers to share a brief thought).
    • (Misconception Check): "Remember, ' giving back ' in Indigenous cultures is a deeply embedded cultural practice and responsibility, vital for nation-building, survivance, and ensuring Indigenous Futurity, rather than merely an optional act of charity."

(Transition: 2 minutes) "Great. These quick checks help us see that integrating these powerful perspectives deepens our understanding and pushes us beyond superficial approaches."

(84-90 Minutes) Segment 6: Wrap-up & Exit Ticket – Your Path Forward

Teacher: We've covered a lot today, exploring how to develop truly critical and creative thinking by combining established logical methods with the profound wisdom of Indigenous sustainability models and cultural knowledge systems. We've seen that by embracing relationality, place-based knowledge, and intergenerational responsibility, we can approach complex challenges with a more holistic, ethical, and effective perspective, whether in our personal lives, our communities, or our professional fields.

(Summary - 2 minutes)
Teacher: Our journey today showed us that thinking critically and creatively means more than just logic; it means seeing the interconnectedness of all things. It means valuing diverse ways of knowing, learning from the land, and planning for seven generations ahead. It's about empowering our communities, understanding systemic barriers, and actively working towards sovereignty restoration and Indigenous Futurity.

(Exit Ticket - 4 minutes)
Teacher: Before you leave, please take a moment to complete this brief exit ticket. On a notecard or a piece of paper, please write down:

  1. One Key Idea: What is one idea from today's lesson that stood out to you or resonated most deeply?
  2. Future Application: How might you apply this integrated critical and creative thinking in your own life, work, or community?

Teacher: Thank you for your engagement, your thoughtful contributions, and for sharing your wisdom today. I look forward to seeing your reflections. Have a wonderful rest of your day.

CANVA PROMPT: QUIZ

CANVA AI PROMPT:

Design a 5-item quiz titled "Indigenous Knowledge & Critical Thinking: Quiz Your Understanding" for adult and re-entry learners. The quiz should be copy-ready with questions, answer key, and specific visual guidelines.

Visual Guidelines:

  • Layout & Readability: Utilize a clean, uncluttered layout with ample white space between elements. Each question should be presented clearly, ideally with one question per page/section to enhance focus. Use a minimum font size of 14pt for body text and 18-24pt for questions, preferring legible sans-serif fonts like Lato, Open Sans, or Montserrat. Ensure 1.5x line spacing.
  • Color Palette: Employ an accessible color palette with high contrast between text and background. Earth tones, natural greens, blues, and muted, warm colors are preferred to create a calming and professional aesthetic. Avoid overly bright or clashing colors.
  • Imagery: Incorporate high-quality, respectful, and relevant imagery. Focus on visuals that evoke learning, community, nature, and Indigenous cultural themes without being stereotypical or reifying. Examples include: images of diverse adult learners in discussion, abstract representations of interconnectedness or knowledge sharing, natural landscapes (e.g., forests, rivers, mountains), or subtle, respectful cultural motifs. Avoid generic stock photos that lack authenticity.
  • Structure: Create clear headings for "Quiz Questions" and "Answer Key" using bold, slightly larger text. Provide simple, direct instructions for the quiz.

Quiz Questions:

  1. According to Reyes (2019), for Native college graduates, "giving back" is primarily understood as what?
  2. Which of the following is NOT a core principle for Indigenizing teaching as discussed by Louie, Pratt, Hanson, & Ottmann (2017)?
    • a) Relational Pedagogy
    • b) Story as Method
    • c) Sole reliance on Western academic metrics
    • d) Decentering the Instructor’s Authority
  3. Lloyd Hawkeye Robertson (2021) argues for a "secular and pragmatic" approach to Indigenization. What does he suggest this approach allows for, regarding Indigenous traditions?
  4. The Menominee Nation's approach to sustainability, as described by Whyte, Caldwell, & Schaefer, is distinctive because it is:
    • a) A universal model designed for all humanity.
    • b) Deeply rooted in abstract, theoretical principles.
    • c) Place-based, historically situated, and tied to their specific governance systems.
    • d) Primarily focused on individual economic outcomes.
  5. What is a primary benefit of integrating Indigenous knowledge systems with traditional critical thinking, as highlighted in the lesson's "Why This Matters" section?

Answer Key:

  1. An integral part of their daily lives and sense of self, serving as a form of nation-building, survivance, and resistance to colonial erasure.
  2. c) Sole reliance on Western academic metrics
  3. It allows Indigenous traditions (like the Medicine Wheel) to be used as adaptable metaphors or frameworks that evolve, integrating modern science and critical thinking, rather than being treated as static, unalterable dogma.
  4. c) Place-based, historically situated, and tied to their specific governance systems.
  5. It enhances the ability to analyze problems from multiple, interconnected perspectives and develop innovative, ethical, and effective solutions to complex real-world issues.

CANVA PROMPT: CROSSWORD

CANVA AI PROMPT:

Create a crossword puzzle activity for adult and re-entry learners. The puzzle should incorporate the following terms and their definitions as clues, along with a letter grid hint for each word. Design the puzzle with a clear, sans-serif font, minimalist design, sufficient white space, and an easy-to-read grid.

Terms and Clues:

  • Indigenization(Hint: I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ): The process of transforming educational institutions, curricula, and pedagogies to incorporate Indigenous worldviews, knowledge systems, languages, and experiences as fundamental elements.
  • Survivance(Hint: S_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ): A term combining "survival" and "resistance," describing the active presence of Indigenous peoples, their ability to persist, adapt, and assert their sovereignty and cultural identity.
  • Relationality(Hint: R_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ): A core Indigenous principle emphasizing the interconnectedness of all living things, including people, land, spirits, and ancestors, highlighting the importance of relationships, respect, and responsibility.
  • Nation-building(Hint: N_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ): For Indigenous peoples, it involves strengthening their self-governance, cultural practices, economic independence, and collective well-being despite colonial impacts.
  • Epistemologies(Hint: E_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ): Theories of knowledge; they describe how we know what we know, including what counts as valid knowledge, how it is acquired, and how it is justified.
  • Reciprocity(Hint: R_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ): The practice of exchanging things with others for mutual benefit; in Indigenous contexts, it's a fundamental principle of giving and receiving, not just between people but also with the land and all beings.
  • Pedagogy(Hint: P_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ): The method and practice of teaching, including the theoretical concepts behind different teaching styles and educational approaches.

QUICK COPY BLOCK

This block contains all the content from the sections above for easy copying.